11/29/13

From author Charles J. Sykes: "14 (of 50) Real-World Antidotes to Feel-Good Education"

Rule No. 1:   Life is not fair. Get used to it. The average teen-ager uses the phrase "It's not fair" 8.6 times a day. You got it from your parents, who said it so often you decided they must be the most idealistic generation ever. When they started hearing it from their own kids, they realized Rule No. 1. 

Rule No. 2:   The real world won't care as much about your self-esteem as much as your school does. It'll expect you to accomplish something before you feel good about yourself. This may come as a shock. Usually, when inflated self-esteem meets reality, kids complain that it's not fair. (See Rule No. 1) 

Rule No. 3:   Sorry, you won't make $40,000 a year right out of high school. And you won't be a vice president or have a car phone either. You may even have to wear a uniform that doesn't have a Gap label. 

Rule No. 4:   If you think your teacher is tough, wait 'til you get a boss. He doesn't have tenure, so he tends to be a bit edgier. When you screw up, he's not going to ask you how you feel about it. 

Rule No. 5:   Flipping burgers is not beneath your dignity. Your grandparents had a different word for burger flipping. They called it opportunity. They weren't embarrassed making minimum wage either. They would have been embarrassed to sit around talking about Kurt Cobain all weekend. 

Rule No. 6:   It's not your parents' fault. If you screw up, you are responsible. This is the flip side of "It's my life," and "You're not the boss of me," and other eloquent proclamations of your generation. When you turn 18, it's on your dime. Don't whine about it, or you'll sound like a baby boomer. 

Rule No. 7:   Before you were born your parents weren't as boring as they are now. They got that way paying your bills, cleaning up your room and listening to you tell them how idealistic you are. And by the way, before you save the rain forest from the blood-sucking parasites of your parents' generation, try delousing the closet in your bedroom. 

Rule No. 8:   Your school may have done away with winners and losers. Life hasn't. In some schools, they'll give you as many times as you want to get the right answer. Failing grades have been abolished and class valedictorians scrapped, lest anyone's feelings be hurt. Effort is as important as results. This, of course, bears not the slightest resemblance to anything in real life. (See Rule No. 1, Rule No. 2 and Rule No. 4.) 

Rule No. 9:   Life is not divided into semesters, and you don't get summers off. Not even Easter break. They expect you to show up every day. For eight hours. And you don't get a new life every 10 weeks. It just goes on and on. While we're at it, very few jobs are interested in fostering your self-expression or helping you find yourself. Fewer still lead to self-realization. (See Rule No. 1 and Rule No. 2.) 

Rule No. 10:   Television is not real life. Your life is not a sitcom. Your problems will not all be solved in 30 minutes, minus time for commercials. In real life, people actually have to leave the coffee shop to go to jobs. Your friends will not be as perky or pliable as Jennifer Aniston. 

Rule No. 11:   Be nice to nerds. You may end up working for them. We all could.


Rule No. 12:   Smoking does not make you look cool. It makes you look moronic. Next time you're out cruising, watch an 11-year-old with a butt in his mouth. That's what you look like to anyone over 20. Ditto for "expressing yourself" with purple hair and/or pierced body parts. 

Rule No. 13:   You are not immortal. (See Rule No. 12.) If you are under the impression that living fast, dying young and leaving a beautiful corpse is romantic, you obviously haven't seen one of your peers at room temperature lately. 

Rule No. 14:   Enjoy this while you can. Sure parents are a pain, school's a bother, and life is depressing. But someday you'll realize how wonderful it was to be a kid. Maybe you should start now. You're welcome.
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/schoolrules.asp#76CUOwGDoVbWWFky.99

11/23/13

Stop with this "revisionist history" of previous Presidential administrations already!

UPDATE 2: Kudos to the (federal) Supreme Court for upholding its Michigan counterpart's ruling on "affirmative action"; the modern-day reversal of the evils of slavery & the lawlessness of segregation, in my view... The last thing we need is a government, be it state (had Michigan ruled the opposite ruling) or federal (had the federal Supreme Court upheld the opposite ruling), using us as "pawns" (for those of you who play chess) in its games to undermine everybody with whom it disagrees!

CONT.: I called most political talkers "conspiracy theorists" previously, & I'll keep calling them such until they learn the correct history of our system:

Republicans, circa 1865/1896: mostly left wing (classical) liberal, against all those aforementioned wrongs, & believers in "equality of opportunity"; that is, allowing everybody to get the same chances at whatever they choose to do! Granted, the communist regimes in Belarus/Castro's Cuba/Venezuela under the idiots Chàvez & Maduro take liberalism to the ultimate horrifying level, but here, you at least see those groups differentiating themselves from everybody else in this country who's decidedly more moderate!

Democrats, circa 1865/1896: mostly right wing (classical) conservatism, for all the wrongs that this country suffered through until the late 1960s, &, with the new Tea Party "movement" now in the political awareness, dare I say, some of those kooks are even more extremist with their individual beliefs! Remember where else such ideologies wrecked countries? Nazi Germany/Fascist Italy, under the brutal Hitler/Mussolini dictatorships? Remember that, neo-Nazis & Fascists? Granted, I have seem some moderate conservatives reject those extremist ideologies, but as long as you have far left-wing pinkos & far right-wing fascists in this country pushing such brutal ideologies on the rest of us, we won't go anywhere except for down in this nation!

UPDATE: I've never seen as many moronic conspiracy theories as I've seen in the past 5 years... It's as if the far right has overtaken the "conspiracy theory" department in an attempt to undermine any real progress not just in the short term, but also in the long term! Since our current President is a Democrat, & as such, conservatives are smacking him around left & right, so I figured I would counterattack their invalid claims by pointing out that "(their) guys", Nixon & Reagan, weren't exactly "saints", either:

- the 40th anniversary of Watergate, which I believe is still the biggest scandal in modern politics, Republican or Democratic!

- Peter Dreier, Occidental College professor (I know... but stick with me!), made some comments upon Reagan's 2004 death that weren't all glowing reviews, as the political talk radio obituaries were (those intentionally blind idiots...):

"During his two terms in the White House (1981-89), Reagan presided over a widening gap between the rich and everyone else; declining wages and living standards for working families; an assault on labor unions as a vehicle to lift Americans into the middle class; a dramatic increase in poverty and homelessness; and the consolidation and deregulation of the financial industry that led to the current mortgage meltdown, foreclosure epidemic, and lingering recession.

These trends were not caused by inevitable socioeconomic forces. They resulted from Reagan's policy and political choices based on a "You're on your own" ideology.

Reagan is often lauded as "the great communicator," but what he often communicated were lies and distortions (the typical politician...). During his stump speeches, while promising to roll back welfare, Reagan told the story of a so-called "welfare queen" in Chicago who drove a Cadillac and had ripped off $150,000 from the government. Journalists searched for this "welfare cheat" and discovered that she didn't exist. But this phony imagery of "welfare cheats" persisted and laid the groundwork for cuts to programs for the poor.

Reagan's most famous statement--"Government is not a solution to our problem. Government is the problem"--has become the unofficial slogan for the resurgence of right-wing extremism. The rants of Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh, the Tea Party, the policy ideas promulgated by outfits like the Cato Institute and the Heritage Foundation masquerading as think tanks, and the takeover of the GOP by its most conservative wing were all incubated during the Reagan years.


Many Americans credit Reagan with reducing the size of government. In reality, he increased government spending, cut taxes, and turned the U.S. from creditor to debtor nation. During his presidency, Reagan escalated the military budget while slashing funds for domestic programs that assisted working-class Americans and protected consumers and the environment.

Before Reagan took office, the American public was already growing more skeptical about government and politicians, exacerbated by the lies told by Lyndon Johnson about the Vietnam War, by Richard Nixon about the Watergate scandal, and then Jimmy Carter's inability to deal with rising prices and unemployment ("stagflation"). But Reagan--with his avuncular style, optimism, and plain-folks demeanor--turned government-bashing into an art form.

Accompanying the Reagan era was the rise of a corporate-funded conservative propaganda machine--including think tanks and lobby groups, endowed professorships at universities, legal advocacy organizations, magazines, and college student internships to train the next generation--designed to demonize government and glorify unregulated markets.

Reagan's fans give him credit for restoring the nation's prosperity. But whatever economic growth occurred during the Reagan years mostly benefited those already well off. The minimum wage was frozen at $3.35 an hour while prices rose, eroding the standard of living of millions of low-wage workers. The number of people living beneath the federal poverty line rose from 26.1 million in 1979 to 32.7 million in 1988. Meanwhile, by the end of the decade, the richest 1 percent of Americans had 39 percent of the nation's wealth.

After signing the Garn-St. Germain Depository Institutions Act in 1982, Reagan presided over the dramatic deregulation of the nation's savings-and-loan industry. The law allowed S&Ls to end their reliance on home mortgages and permitted banks to provide adjustable-rate mortgage loans. The S&Ls began a decade-long orgy of real estate speculation, mismanagement, and fraud. The industry indulged in a wild ride of merger mania, with banks and S&Ls gobbling each other up and making loans to finance shopping malls, golf courses, office buildings, and condo projects that had no logic other than a quick-buck profit.

When the dust settled, hundreds of S&Ls and banks had gone under, billions of dollars of commercial loans were useless, and the federal government was left to bail out depositors whose money speculators had looted to the tune of more than $130 billion.

This was just the first chapter in the slide toward today's financial crisis. Things got even worse--much worse--in the decades after Reagan left office. Both Bushes, and Clinton, took up where Reagan left off in granting banks and insurance companies permission to wreak havoc on consumers and the economy, leading to the epidemic of subprime loans and foreclosures of recent years and the federal bailout of "too big to fail" Wall Street banks.

Reagan's indifference to urban problems was legendary. He failed to deal with the growing corruption scandal at Housing and Urban Development that resulted in the indictment and conviction of top Reagan administration officials for illegally targeting housing subsidies to politically connected developers.

Reagan didn't invent the pay-to-play game, or the revolving door of top government officials becoming well-paid lobbyists and government contractors. But his hands-off attitude toward government oversight contributed to the deepening culture of corruption.

The 1980s saw pervasive racial discrimination by banks, real estate agents, and landlords, unmonitored by the Reagan administration. Community groups uncovered blatant redlining by banks. But Reagan's HUD and Department of Justice failed to prosecute or sanction banks that violated the Community Reinvestment Act, which prohibits racial discrimination in lending. Of the 40,000 applications from banks requesting permission to expand their operations, Reagan's bank regulators denied only eight on grounds of violating CRA regulations.

The declining fiscal fortunes of America's cities began during these years. By the end of his second term, federal assistance to local governments had been slashed by 60 percent. He eliminated general revenue sharing to cities, cut funding for public-service jobs and job training, almost dismantled federally funded legal services for the poor, cut the antipoverty Community Development Block Grant program, and reduced funds for public transit.

These cutbacks had a disastrous effect on cities with high levels of poverty and limited property-tax bases, many of which depended on federal aid to provide basic services. In 1980, federal dollars accounted for 22 percent of big-city budgets. By the end of Reagan's second term, federal aid was only 6 percent. The consequences were devastating to schools and libraries, hospitals and clinics, and sanitation, police, and fire departments--many of which had to shut their doors.

The most dramatic cut in domestic spending was for low-income housing subsidies. In his first year in office, Reagan cut the budget for public housing and Section 8 rent subsidies in half. Congress thwarted his plan to wipe out federal housing assistance to the poor altogether, but he got much of what he sought.

Another of Reagan's enduring legacies is the steep increase in the number of homeless people, which by the late 1980s had swollen to 600,000 on any given night--and 1.2 million over the course of a year. Many were Vietnam veterans, children, and laid-off workers.


Since his death, we've named a major airport, many schools, and many streets after Ronald Reagan. Perhaps a more fitting tribute to his legacy would be for each American city to name a park bench--where at least one homeless person sleeps every night--in his honor."

Mark Weisbrot of Common Dreams opined on the Reagan administration's fiscal legacy:

"Budget deficits soared to record heights. The national debt doubled, as a percentage of the economy, before Mr. Reagan's successors were able to bring it under control. This "military Keynesianism" did pull the economy out of the 1982 recession, but the 1980s still chalked up the slowest growth of any decade in the post-World War II era. And income was redistributed to the wealthy as never before: during the 1980s, most of the country's income gains went to the top 1 or 2 percent of households.

Mr. Reagan also helped redistribute American income and wealth with a bold assault on American labor. In 1981 he summarily fired 12,000 air traffic controllers who went on strike for better working conditions. This ushered in a new and dark era of labor relations, with employers now free to "permanently replace" striking workers. The median real wage failed to grow during the decade of the 1980s.

The Reagan revolution caused even more economic damage internationally, for example by changing policy at the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. Thus began the era of "structural adjustment" -- a set of economic policies that has become so discredited worldwide that the IMF and World Bank no longer use the term. The 1980s became "the lost decade" for Latin America, the region most affected by Washington's foreign economic policy. Income per person actually shrank for the decade, a rare historical event, and the region has yet to come close to its pre-1980s growth rates."
see this: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/02/budget_15_pay_raise_for_civili.html

As everybody who isn't currently "living under a rock" knows, yesterday was the 50th anniversary of the JFK assassination! Not only did that anniversary allow those of you who were around back then to tell various media outlets "I was at such-and-such a place", but it also opened what I believe is a necessary debate on the role of the Secret Service & other agencies in protecting those who work for us in DC (more on that later)! By modern-day accounts, JFK became President on the back of the newest form of political discourse (debates), & he encountered a bunch of challenges, both domestic & abroad, that threatened to collapse the country's civil society (at best) or cause a so-called "nuclear apocalypse" (at worst)! Back then, however, the overall attitude toward Castro's Cuba, the Soviet Union, & all the wars that had either just ended or were "just heating up" (Korea, Vietnam, etc.), seemed less urgent than nowadays, mostly because the country's overall attitude toward its own government wasn't so hostile, & the rest of the world didn't see the U.S. as "the world's police state" just yet! On the "home front", he was a believer in just enough government intervention in the civil rights debate, as well as the necessary amounts of tax cuts that would keep regular people from forking over their entire life savings to DC, while also keeping Wall Street & other corporations in just enough of a check to keep them from running away with our money, & echoing the modern-day loose monetary policy "creed", he kept interest rates near then-historic lows; however, political divisions were just as apparent back then as they are now, as political infighting, even in various Democratic strongholds, threatened to ruin the Democratic Party's overall unity, & various fascist groups labeled JFK "communist" & mentioned that he "should be tried for treason", despite the fact that he was fighting such groups to the full extent that his administration could! Even before 1960, then-senator JFK made a foreign policy impact when he stated his full support for the then-new nation of Israel: "Israel will endure and flourish. It is the child of hope and the home of the brave. It can neither be broken by adversity nor demoralized by success. It carries the shield of democracy and it honors the sword of freedom." As another sign of his softening toward Israel, he ended the arms embargo that Eisenhower & Truman (not exactly among the most extremist Presidents in this nation's history!) inexplicably placed upon Israel. He was a balanced-budget proponent instead of a tax-cut proponent, & instead of needlessly attacking the Soviet Union after the failed Bay of Pigs invasion, he instead dared the Soviets to install nuclear missiles in Cuba, & then, he allowed his military people to slowly, but surely, turn the Soviet cargo ships away 1 by 1 instead of all at once! In the immediate aftermath of that scare, he agreed to cut the country's nuke supply instead of building it up to dangerous levels (more on that later)! Fast forward about 20 years, past Vietnam, Watergate, & the long-term economic "malaise", however, & we see a return to the instability of the "World War era", at least in my opinion, during the Reagan administration! Early on in his administration, he survived an assassination attempt of his own by ultra-radical crazy Marxist-inspired nut John Hinckley, Jr., which, had it worked, would've been just as devastating to the country as JFK's assassination was, & unlike JFK, it would've ended Reagan's presidency just as it started, leaving him with no legacy whatsoever! Getting past that assassination attempt, however, I agree with liberals & moderate Republicans whenever they claim that "Reagan wouldn't make it out of the Republican primaries today", & here's why: 1: In the immediate aftermath of that assassination attempt, he was for both gun control & mental health control, mostly at the urging of his Press Secretary, James Brady, but unfortunately for them, those bills never got signed into law until the 1st days of the Clinton administration! 2: He brought in his "cronies" from his years as CA governor to serve with him in DC, & out of all of his CA "cronies", Rita Lavelle, his EPA commissioner, was the 1 who allowed his/her agency to do the most damage out of any of Reagan's cabinet agencies, as she allowed some Superfund sites to go completely unchecked for years, & took $$$$ from the ones that were checked & simply "redistributed" it within the EPA, as I'm sure any fine-tuned radical nut job would do.… 3: Savings & loan institutions everywhere were just simply allowed to collapse during his early years, & others that were (this might sound familiar to you Wall Street followers) bailed out at a cost of billions (approximately $341 billion, as a matter of fact) to typical, everyday citizens! 4: In a series of attacks that far outweighs the impact of Benghazi on this country's foreign policy, 241 American & 58 French troops were killed in Beirut in 1983, 5: Contrary to most hard-line conservatives' beliefs that Obama must "hate" Israel for no apparent reason, well, by their own logic, Reagan must have had more "hate" for Israel deep down inside of him, as well as deep within his administration, since he never visited Israel, while his predecessor, Jimmy Carter, did so in 1979, Bill Clinton did so in 1994, 1995, 1996, & 1998, & Obama made sure to do so early this year! 6: "Reaganomics" introduced sharp & sudden tax cuts that should've been saved for more prosperous times in this country's economy, & during Reagan's 1st term, the earliest effects of Reaganomics threatened to wreck the country's economy almost beyond repair! Interest rates, which, as I mentioned, were at historic lows during JFK's short presidency were at almost 20% in 1981; as a result just of those sky-high interest rates, GDP actually fell 1.9% in 1982, as ordinary people felt the effects of Reaganomics' drastic across-the-board cuts! Immediately following the recession of 1982, trouble emerged, as average unemployment was slightly higher, & average productivity & private investment growth were slightly lower, instead of the other way around! Unemployment was also at its highest point following the recession (10.8%), & poverty ranged from anywhere between 13 & 15.2% during his administration! The largest tax increase ever recorded in DC also came in the midst of Reagan's 1st-term recession, & ironically enough, it was a Democrat in the DC House who originally introduced that bill, not to raise taxes, but to instead lower them! Perhaps the most destructive consequence of Reaganomics is 1 that is still being felt by us ordinary people today, & is 1 that our idiotic politicians keep "kicking down the road" nowadays instead of fixing: the national debt, which broke the trillion level during the Reagan administration, & while all subsequent administrations have (unfortunately) kept the debt above $1 trillion, it has grown at a slower pace during all of them than it did under Reagan!

11/20/13

I'm planning on revisiting a few of my former schools soon!

I know I've already mentioned in many of my previous posts here that I've planned on revisiting some of my former schools recently, & I've backtracked on my plans multiple times so far, but considering next week is Thanksgiving week, I'm planning on finally keeping my promise(s) to revisit those places perhaps as early as then! I already showed you my schedule a few weeks ago, & in that, I mentioned that I have nothing until 7 P.M. on Mondays & 8:30 P.M. on Wednesdays! Due to those "quirks" on my 1st semester schedule, I've been able to either (a) catch up on the rest of the days, (b) just "unwind", or © both! I already told you a few months ago that my current schedule @ M.S.U. didn't give us any days off @ all 'til Thanksgiving, so I might as well take advantage of finally having a long weekend to do anything other than college stuff! Speaking of "college stuff", I was strongly leaning toward taking a winter course, but after everything that's happened this semester, & having the only psychology course offered @ M.S.U. having closed up early on in winter session registration, I'm planning on either (a) taking a winter course with another local university & hoping that those credits transfer back to M.S.U. with me, or just taking the winter completely off & stacking my spring schedule to the maximum extent that I feel comfortable with (which I think would be somewhere between 15 & 20 credits) & just @ least passing all of those classes! As for my future beyond next May, as of right now, that still stands….. In other words, I'm still planning on transferring then, & if that means adjusting my spring schedule to be able to achieve that goal, then so be it….. I've already made quite a few "comebacks" (grade-wise, that is!) in previous years, & if I hope to graduate college with my major in business/economics/finance/etc. & a minor in psychology, then I might as well pull a few more of those out of somewhere in future semesters & years! Getting back on topic here, I should probably remind you that I was back @ my middle school for the 1st time ever just last June, on the occasion of my H.S. graduation (which, @ least for me, was a mere formality by the beginning of this calendar year, but that day was special nonetheless!), so I'm not entirely certain any of them will recognize me early on, but trust me; when they see my H.S. yearbook & all the people who also made it through the entire past 4 years & graduated with me last June, I'm sure that by then, they'll not only recognize me, but they'll probably also want a few of them to return there sometime soon & discuss everything that's happened to them over the past 4 years, if they haven't already returned there sometime between then & now!
my former middle school, which I noticed had almost no changes whatsoever when I was there last June! 

my former (as of just 5 months ago) high school, which I've noticed in person many times since then!

11/11/13

DISTURBING video of Venezuelan electronics looters!

http://www.youtube.com/v/3D4Zktt_dCE?version=3&autohide=1&autohide=1&showinfo=1&feature=share&autoplay=1&attribution_tag=EaB-1fqlOss8qdJvx2h8KA

11/9/13

A certain (former) teen celeb was back in the headlines recently…..

(12/19 response to VICE Magazine: I know these 2 recently divorced, & the guy who was foolish enough to take her last name despite never marrying her went public with his equally foolish attempt to get his otherwise unknown (at least to me) group some publicity, but that doesn't give you the right to just bash everybody involved in the proceedings! Just because her latest album was a so-called "eponymous" album, doesn't give you the right to call her irrelevant at this stage of her life! Last time I checked, your organization was irrelevant until crazy guy Dennis Rodman came calling & begged you to visit the "hermit kingdom" of North Korea with him! That's not even 1 of my biggest complaints with your critique of this woman & her music… My biggest complaints with your pointless critique of this album are, in no particular order: 1: You mentioned the Sex Pistols, who, last time I checked, haven't released anything new since 4 singles in 2007 & a bootleg concert album the following year! I don't really give any you-know-whats about the fact that most of Ms. Lavigne's newest album was on the radio last year, & for that matter, I don't really give any you-know-whats that she hasn't followed the conventional music industry track (no pun intended) record by releasing any sort of "best of" albums yet… The fact that you insulted everybody else's intelligence by claiming that she didn't know the "Sex Pistols", or that she "wasn't punk", is where you crossed the line with me! I'd also like to remind you ******* about the way Sid what's-his-face went out: 10/12/78: stabs his GF dead in an NYC hotel room - tries to commit suicide 10 days later; 2/1/79: after 55 days at Rikers Island, shoots himself full of heroin; dies at his new GF's apartment during a celebration of the ****** having received a bailout in the 1st place!

(12/20 UPDATE: Dennis Rodman is apparently back in the "hermit kingdom", North Korea, yet again… VICE "bankrolled" him last time, & apparently, they're at it again!

Rodman on his newest dictator friend, Lil'Kim (the emphasis in the quotes is mine): "I can't control what they do with their government, I can't control what they say or how they do things here," he said. "I'm just trying to come here as a sports figure and try to hope I can open the door for a lot of people in the country." "I've come over to see my friend, and people always give me a little hard time about me saying that." "I'm very proud to say he's my friend, because he hasn't done anything to put a damper, to say any negative things about my country." As if those comments weren't enough for Dennis, he then took those comments 1 step further: "North Korea has given me the opportunity to bring these players and their families over here, so people can actually see, so these players can actually see, that this country is actually not as bad as people project it to be in the media." 

On VICE Magazine itself, according to  http://www.theguardian.com/media/2008/mar/30/pressandpublishing.tvandradioarts?gusrc=rss&feed=media: from founder Shane Smith: 'We wanted to be the first international voice for the universality of youth sub-culture. There was a time in the Nineties when it was all about cocaine & asymmetrical zippers. We did a lot of drugs & went to a lot of parties and had sex with a lot of supermodels. But you realize there's a whole world out there, & as we've expanded, the scope of the magazine has gotten broader. We became a magazine when the barriers to making a magazine effectively became nonexistent. You could do desktop publishing on a Mac & print for cheap. Now you get a digicam and a Mac, & you can have something broadcast on the net within 15 minutes.'

You might think that Smith & his VICE colleagues would stop their culture bashing right there, but in a January 2012 interview with Forbes Magazine (1 of our political right wing's favorite rags), he goes from being this countercultural icon to anti-almost everything imaginable!

On our 2 main political parties & their associated "movements": "When you get down to it, the politics of it is juvenile. There’s no real cohesive manifesto or even cohesive ask. They’re saying, well, we should tax the rich and give it to more people. And I say, well, I get it, but you understand that government tax redistribution has another name, and that’s communism. You want to take from rich people and give to each according to his need. I mean, you don’t want to say it, but that’s what you’re saying. The economic system here is ******. But if you’re going to try to fix it or change it, you have to have something a little more cohesive than “redistribution of wealth” and then not even know what communism or socialism is. Have you not read a book? I like the fact that they’re protesting. It’s just really sad when you go down there. It’s like talking to kindergarten children. What are you doing? Why are you even here? If there was a real revolution, man, I’d be there just for the fun of it." 

On corporate culture & companies themselves: "I’m gonna get myself in a lot of **** here… Obviously, Facebook is great. The problem is Zuckerberg, who’s the Stalin of Facebook, is his own worst enemy. If he was a different guy, everyone would like him. There’s so much pent-up animosity against Facebook because of him and his culture. When Google+ was released, everyone wanted it to work, even though it was a piece of ****. I think it would have a much better public perception if he was a different dude or if he wasn’t, like, the face. I was at Facebook, & if you go there, the ******* campus is great, and its super good vibes, the people are great. But the perception people have in their heads is these entitled, socially awkward nerds. But as a company, you have to respect the **** out of what they’ve done. It started as this little thing, & now it’s the thing."

On potentially selling VICE: "The reason why I would do that is if we became the network of Facebook or the network of Google, we’d achieve that dream of mine overnight of being the next CNN & the next ESPN & the next MTV with the largest audience in the world; it would be hard to say no to that not because of the money, but because of the ******* cultural impact you would have. At this point, I don’t give a **** about money. Once you have a certain amount of money, it ceases to be an issue. I’d rather put my cultural imprint on the fabric of life. After money, all you want is immortality.

Just like his stooge, Dennis Rodman, Smith also manages to offend yours truly, this time with a rather nationalistic comment more typical of political talk show hosts than magazine co-founders: "I grew up being a socialist & I have problems with it because I grew up in Canada & I’ve spent a lot of time in Scandinavia, where I believe countries legislate out creativity. They cut off the tall trees. Everyone’s a C-minus. I came to America from Canada because Canada is stultifyingly boring and incredibly hypocritical. Thanks, Canada." 

As usual, I'd like to defend Canada from its misguided critics, like Shane Smith, but instead of doing so with my own words this time, I'd like to quote the late CFRB Toronto radio broadcaster Gordon Sinclair, who delivered the following staunchly pro-American speech on the aforementioned radio station the afternoon of June 5, 1973: 

"The United States dollar took another pounding on German, French and British exchanges this morning, hitting the lowest point ever known in West Germany. It has declined there by 41% since 1971, & this Canadian thinks it is time to speak up for the Americans as the most generous & possibly the least-appreciated people in all the world. As long as sixty years ago, when I first started to read newspapers, I read of floods on the Yellow River and the Yangtze. Well, who rushed in with men and money to help? The Americans did, that's who. They have helped control floods on the Nile, the Amazon, the Ganges and the Niger. Today, the rich bottom land of the Mississippi is under water, & no foreign land has sent a dollar to help. Germany, Japan &, to a lesser extent, Britain and Italy, were lifted out of the debris of war by the Americans who poured in billions of dollars and forgave other billions in debts. None of those countries is today paying even the interest on its remaining debts to the United States. When the franc was in danger of collapsing in 1956, it was the Americans who propped it up, & their reward was to be insulted and swindled on the streets of Paris. I was there. I saw that. When distant cities are hit by earthquakes, it is the United States that hurries into help… Managua, Nicaragua is one of the most recent examples. So far this spring, 59 American communities have been flattened by tornadoes. Nobody has helped. The Marshall Plan... the Truman Policy... all pumped billions upon billions of dollars into discouraged countries. Now, newspapers in those countries are writing about the decadent war-mongering Americans. Now, I'd like to see just one of those countries that is gloating over the erosion of the United States dollar build its own airplanes. Come on... let's hear it! Does any other country in the world have a plane to equal the Boeing Jumbo Jet, the Lockheed Tristar or the Douglas 10? If so, why don't they fly them? Why do all international lines except Russia fly American planes? Why does no other land on earth even consider putting a man or a woman on the moon? You talk about Japanese technocracy, & you get radios. You talk about German technocracy, & you get automobiles. You talk about American technocracy, & you find men on the moon, not once, but several times … & safely home again. You talk about scandals, & the Americans put theirs right in the store window for everybody to look at. Even the draft dodgers are not pursued and hounded. They are right here on our streets in Toronto, most of them… unless they are breaking Canadian laws... are getting American dollars from Ma and Pa at home to spend here. When the Americans get out of this bind… as they will… who could blame them if they said "the **** with the rest of the world"? Let someone else buy the bonds, let someone else build or repair foreign dams or design foreign buildings that won't shake apart in earthquakes. When the railways of France, Germany and India were breaking down through age, it was the Americans who rebuilt them. When the Pennsylvania Railroad and the New York Central went broke, nobody loaned them an old caboose. Both of them are still broke. I can name to you 5,000 times when the Americans raced to the help of other people in trouble. Can you name to me even one time when someone else raced to the Americans in trouble? I don't think there was outside help even during the San Francisco earthquake. Our neighbors have faced it alone, & I am one Canadian who is ****ed tired of hearing them getting kicked around. They will come out of this thing with their flag high, & when they do, they are entitled to thumb their noses at the lands that are gloating over their present troubles. I hope Canada is not one of these. But there are many smug, self-righteous Canadians. Finally, the American Red Cross was told at its 48th Annual meeting in New Orleans this morning that it was broke. This year's disasters… with the year less than half-over... has taken it all & nobody... but nobody... has helped."


http://omg.yahoo.com/news/avril-lavignes-ex-husband-deryck-whibley-dropping-her-164000043-us-weekly.html

http://www.tmz.com/2013/11/07/avril-lavigne-deryck-whibley-files-name-change-divorce/

http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/avril-lavigne-met-fiance-chad-kroeger-while-dating-deryck-whibley-2013235

(PUN-WORTHY HEADLINE ALERT!) http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2013/11/08/avril-lavigne-ex-husband-finally-drops-her-last-name-most-complicated-celebrity/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fentertainment+%28Internal+-+Entertainment+-+Mixed%29

(EDIT: The pun that Fox News used in that headline, according to pun fusion.com, is called a "recursive" pun; in other words, you'd have to understand that Ms. Lavigne released a song with the aforementioned title (in 2001, not 2002, BTW!) to understand the headline's "hidden meaning", or whatever you call those!)





As you can probably tell by those headlines, another celebrity divorce has stirred up some controversies among the tabloids & related media outlets everywhere….. I had never heard of Sum 41 before I read these articles, but I'm sure almost all of you have heard about everybody else involved here..... I'm sure you already figured it out just by looking @ her name, but the now-29-year-old (more on that later, BTW!) Avril Lavigne is, in fact, Canadian..... In fact, I just found an article from Blender magazine from 2001 (thanks, Buzzfeed!) that mentions that she was born in "the tiny town of Napanee, Ontario (population 5,000)..... relocated to NYC..... left Manhattan for LA....." so on & so forth..... You probably also figured out by now that Nickelback is also Canadian, & that the group's 2001 single "How You Remind Me" reached #1 on the Billboard Top 100..... Now, that might have been where you 1st heard them, but that's not where they were most recently..... Most recently, their single "Burn it to the Ground" , when it wasn't being featured in NHL 10, reached 4 different positions on the Billboard charts, the highest of which was #3, & they performed the Olympics in February 2010 & the NFL Thanksgiving halftime show in 2011, after NHL 10 gave that single some much-needed exposure! (EDIT: I would be mistaken in claiming that Sum 41 was completely nonexistent a few years ago..... In fact, they appeared in NHL 2002, right around the time of Nickelback's #1 hit & Lavigne's 17-year-old debut & success in her own age group, as she won multiple awards early on in her career (Radio Disney, which I've never liked, in 2002, 3, & 4; & Nickelodeon in '03, which might seem like "gimmick" awards to you, & quite frankly, those seem like gimmicks to me.....)..... but she was also nominated for a few actual awards, such as the Grammys in '03 & '04, the Brits that same year, &, considering everybody mentioned in this post is Canadian, the Juno awards in '03,'04, & '05!

COURTESY OF TMZ: "He didn't even know who I was at that point!" she said of Kroeger, 38. (who's to say that she knew anything about him back then?) "I had just gotten on the radio." (2001) The angst, pop (star) later went on to say "Now that I'm somebody, people are taking notice. Chad couldn't have known me at all back then, when I was nobody, so I don't fault him for that. I mean, what was there about me to get to know? There were no lyrics. (.....but there was 1 quite common question!)There was no music. (not for her, that was.....) No mention of my name in the media. It was as if I didn't exist. Like I was just another nobody human out there with nothing to offer. But now, now everything is different. It was beautiful when he first noticed me, like a pedophile at a park coming through the trees just before the sun sets and there's that special glint of light on the  swings. Anyway... As long as I stay relevant, we can get through anything." 

As for any sort of "image problems" this might cause any of the people involved, I think the only real differences between this & other divorces will be the fact that all of them are famous singers, either by themselves or in some band of some kind! The thing is, from a longevity standpoint, while Sum 41 fell off the face of the planet, @ least in this country, & Nickelback spent a few years in relative obscurity before the new decade returned them to prominence, as mentioned earlier, Lavigne debuted @ 17, received all of those aforementioned nominations for her earliest singles, & through it all, she somehow managed to keep herself out of scandals, unlike many of her fellow celebrities! In fact, according to the abovementioned Blender magazine article, she is quoted as saying "I'm not into glitz & glamo(u)r. It's sooo fake. But my 1st single (which I'm sure many of you people still remember!) is all over MTV, so I'm being recognized already. That probably means goodbye to my private life, but hey, it's cool. If anybody tries to kiss my butt, I'll just tell them, 'shut the **** up'." (Blender magazine, 2001) 

That just goes to show you that no matter how many ***** you give about other peoples' opinions of you, if you don't like them, or vice versa, if they don't like you, & the reasons for doing so seem rather flawed instead of reasonable, then no matter what you try to do to change their opinions of you, or your opinions of them, then nothing will make you or the other person change your/their opinions! My overall point is, & I'm sure those of you who attended school with me prior to this year can probably attest to this, but I'd much rather have close to the utmost respect from just a few people instead of having just slight respect from bunches of random people! You might think that I'm planning on becoming 1 of those people who has people worldwide claiming to have known me "before (I) was famous", but in reality, I certainly won't mind telling a few of my future associates/acquaintances/co-workers/etc. that I knew a few of you "before (you) were famous", as I send multiple $1,000/$10,000/possibly even $100,000 checks your way via Western Union, or whichever money transfer company ends up being most common by then, from whichever Fortune 500 company/companies I end up working for..... After all, deep down, aren't we, & shouldn't we all, be like the 17-year-old Avril Lavigne, not in it for the fame, but rather, in it for the respect of past, present, & future members of society?

11/4/13

local NFL observations, just in time for SB XLVIII!

I was at the above mentioned Metlife Stadium in East Rutherford, NJ this afternoon for the 1st NFL game of either of the 2 NFL teams that call that stadium home (which, in this case, would be the Jets), & throughout the game (which was actually quite unexpected, @ least for all the New Orleans fans who dared to invade N.J. on this particular afternoon….. http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2013110303/2013/REG9/saints@jets#menu=highlights&tab=recap), & even on the way into & out of the stadium, I noticed some things on the local roadways that suggested that SB XLVIII won't be an entirely positive experience around here for the fans of the 2 NFL teams that make it that far! Perhaps the most well-known of the problems surrounding the Meadowlands is this monstrosity known throughout the past decade under various names: Meadowlands Xanadu (2003-2007), Xanadu Meadowlands (2007-09), Meadowlands (2009-11), & the American Dream Meadowlands (2011-present)….. Originally conceived by the now-bankrupt Mills Corporation, it got transferred to various development companies, & in that time, it got that downright ugly color scheme that I'm sure all of you people have already seen numerous times in print & online!
(that's 1 ugly color scheme!)
(the ugly color scheme as seen from the now-rebranded Hilton Meadowlands)

Even though the project has been delayed by numerous bankruptcies & ownership transfers, not to mention being called all kinds of names (none of which are exactly PG-13 enough for this blog, unfortunately), that's not the only problem plaguing next February's SB XLVIII! The NFL, along with the states of N.J. & NY, has designated practically all of NYC the unofficial "host" of all the usual pre-SB activities, but, as they say in TV infomercials, "that's not all"; they've even designated Montclair (population 37,669) as the "official" "host" for "hospitality" for that entire week, which, having been in that municipality numerous times over the years, I understand that the NFL would much rather have a cleanish location (like Montclair or Bloomfield) representing the host region instead of a ghettoish location (like Paterson or Passaic, which I, for some strange reason, absolutely must bash every time I mention them online!)….. On top of the lack of representation on the N.J. side of this whole collaboration, there were apparently a few battles earlier this year between local mayors & the stadium, which lead to threats from the mayors to withhold their cops from the stadium for the actual game! (http://www.nj.com/bergen/index.ssf/2013/02/meadowlands_mayors_threaten_to_withhold_emergency_services_during_super_bowl.html#incart_river)

(http://www.northjersey.com/news/190502801_Mayors_resisting_Super_Bowl_cost.html?page=all)

I don't see the "hospitality", however, in those 2 particular locations (Bloomfield & Montclair), just for the reason that they don't actually have any hotels! If you want hotels around here, people, you'd have to look far outside those municipalities for a hotel stay….. East Rutherford itself has a few hotel options, such as Extended Stay America & the place that was a Sheraton for over a 1/4-century before becoming a Hilton earlier this year! Secaucus, which is just to the east of East Rutherford, has an Econo Lodge, a Holiday Inn, a Hilton Garden Inn, a Rodeway Inn (1 of their few NYC-area locations), an Embassy Suites, & a Crowne Plaza, all of which offer views of either NYC or Newark, N.J., depending on which direction your hotel room faces! Obviously, there are quite a few other locations between the stadium & NYC that will keep you people traveling over here with your teams for a few days, but those are just the lodging facilities closest to the stadium itself