12/18/17

What would happen if all of the U.S. states suddenly split?

How far from the edge of a state do you live? If the country were to split 50 ways, that would become an international border where you'd have to stop, show papers, have your vehicle be inspected, and potentially pay taxes to cross into the next state or come home. (and this wouldn't be like the easy U.S.-Canada border.)
When you go to the store, do you know where all the stuff in the stores comes from? Nearly everything probably doesn't come from the state you live in. It'd have to cross half a dozen borders if not more just to reach you. A lot of our food comes from California, and manufactured goods are shipped from Asia to the West Coast. Now, however, food and goods and medicine would have a similarly lengthy journey. The train would have to go through customs and import taxes to get into Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, and finally into Illinois. That's pretty stupid compared to being able to it just having to cross the border once in the port in California, and then be driven without stopping the rest of the way to your local area.
Countries all have their own currencies and independent economies. The stock market in N.Y.C. wouldn't matter anymore unless you live in N.Y. State. Whatever retirement or savings you have would vaporize, since it probably isn't in the currency of your state or even located in your state. Banks would suddenly have to deal with accounts in 50 different currencies. The value of the currencies would all fluctuate dramatically for a while as it takes time to figure out exactly how worthless Mississippi and Alabama and Nebraska dollars are compared to California and N.Y. dollars. Instrest rates would go haywire and it'd be difficult and costly to sell your house or buy one if you have to move. Depending on what state you live in and what sort of industry and economic activities it has, your smartphones might stay the same price or they might become astronomically expensive along with everything else, if your state tends to import everything, because in general, the value of the currency will settle where imports balance exports. If your state has to buy (import) everything but doesn't have much to sell (export), then your currency is not going to have much value which makes exports (all the stuff from outside your state) expensive.)
(Consider Greece and Spain. They don't have much industry so they have to import a lot of stuff (sending their money out of their countries). How do they get money to come into their country? They specialize in tourism. They get people to come to them for vacations and spend their money in their countries. This might work in Hawaii and Florida. How are places like Mississippi and Alabama and West Virginia going to attract tourists? Also, being a citizen of a state means you're stuck in that state unless another state allows you to immigrate to it. You can't move to where there are jobs. So if you live in Indiana, you're sinking or swimming in Indiana.)
Business will become very difficult and a lot of jobs will be lost. Right now we're part of a 320 million person economy. The average state is like 3-5 million people. (Poland isn't on the 'booming' side of Europe, and it has 38 million people, which is bigger than even California.) So now your country, rather than being the huge and powerful U.S.A., is going to be another Iceland (without the ocean and volcanoes and beautiful scenery). Congrats! 
See right now, a business only has to set up one operation somewhere in the US and has potentially 320 million customers. You can take a risk and start a business or new industry that doesn't have any customers, but you only have to find your customers as a tiny fraction of our giant market to get a toe-hold to stick around. If we become 50 separate countries, now Mr. Big European or Chinese Company will set up in only the bigger states (like California, Texas, N.Y., Illinois, Pennsylvania, Florida) because those are the only ones where it is economical to set up a business--where there are enough customers to justify the hassle of setting up a business in a foreign country.
If you're a healthcare company, you only have to get your new medicine certified and approved once and now you can sell it to 320 million people. If we're 50 countries, now you have go get your medicine approved by 50 different organizations. Or for some states, it'd probably not be practical to have many regulations, so then those states would be awash in quack medicine. Same thing with patents. You'd have to patent your new invention or improvement in 50 different patent offices. That's 50 different lawyers you'd have to pay. What if your competitor beats you to the office in a few of the states? Now you can sell your product in like Georgia, Colorado, and Virginia but not in North Carolina, Massachusetts, or Montana. Does that even make sense?
It's not just poor or rural or small states that'd do poorly. Even if you live in California or N.Y. or Texas or Florida, your great economies are going to go into the crapper as well. The finance district in Manhattan is the size of a finance district for the whole U.S.. If the rest of the U.S. isn't part of N.Y. anymore, then all of that would close, because most of it wouldn't be needed anymore, along with much of the rest of the office space going vacant. It isn't needed there in N.Y.C.. Hollywood is making movies for a 320 million person country. How many movies does a 35 million person country need? Also, now all the other states will be pushing their own industries, like their own home film companies.
Also let's say California, Texas, Florida, and N.Y. all manage to do OK. Are California and Texas going to put down the money to build and maintain a system of quality highways that run between them in the foreign countries of Arizona and New Mexico? Probably not. So now it becomes that much harder for California and Texas to do business with each other.
Internationally, foreign countries would see how much distress the various US states are in, and start to buddy up with some of them. Let's say Japan became friends with Washington and Oregon, while China became friends with California. Now you could see Japan and China fighting each other by stirring up people and trouble on our west coast - people from Oregon and California wasting time and effort fighting each other over stupid reasons that have nothing to do with any of us.
I've read some stuff about what people think would have happened if the North lost the Civil War and the South did become its own country. Some people think the ripe-to-industrialize North would have fallen in with industrial Germany, while the South would have remained close trading partners with the U.K. and France. Well, WWI was only 55 years after the Civil War. Can you imagine how horrible it'd have been if the same sort of trench warfare of WWI was fought similarly along the Mason-Dixon line? In addition to all the economic benefits of being one large country, being one large country and not fragmented keeps us all from having to fight wars with each other. The last major wars fought in North America were the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812, the Civil War, and the Mexican Revolution, and two of those were domestic wars not affecting the other countries in North America. The U.S., Canada, and Mexico, right now, in essence have a huge fortress all to ourselves that is surrounded by ocean. We are so lucky, historically speaking.

12/12/17

Mercyhurst @ AIC recap; discussing retail news and out-of-place "holiday" advertising

My most recent game, despite me telling you that I would stick to either N.Y.C. or Philadelphia this weekend, in order to be able to check out all the usual "holiday lights" in Manhattan, instead came in downtown Springfield, MA, at the former Springfield Civic Center turned MassMutual Center, which is just old enough (opened 1972) to have hosted the then-New England Whalers, before the team moved to the NHL in 1979, as part of the NHL/WHA merger, and Hartford, CT, in 1981, respectively, when the NHL basically "decreed", under pressure from the Boston Bruins, that the team change its name to reference its specific location...

Springfield, in general, reminds me of Bridgeport, CT, except with more "colonial" buildings, owing to the city's role in this country's earliest era after independence, although, obviously, Boston has since grown much bigger than Springfield, and also at a much faster pace than Springfield and other New England-based cities!

Also, I (sort of) made up for not making it to the James Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame (located just about five minutes from the arena location), by checking out, as you'll see in the most recent additions to my little "virtual photo gallery", the Springfield Hockey Hall of Fame, which honors just about every professional hockey coach/official/player to have passed through the city, specifically with the: (Springfield Indians; Springfield Falcons; New England Whalers; Springfield Thunderbirds; AIC Yellow Jackets)

This game pit Mercyhurst University (Erie, PA) against American International College, which itself moved into the MassMutual Center in 2015, after outgrowing the "community" ice rink it had previously called home! Even weirder than that was the timing of this game: part of a back-to-back pair of 2 P.M. opening faceoffs, which you would expect to "stunt" the attendance figures, but not nearly to the extent it did this weekend!

The game itself almost seemed more like a boxing or wrestling match, instead of a hockey game, with tons of hits throughout the game, mostly from AIC, which opened the scoring before anybody had even entered the building (insert "attendance" joke here), and, indeed, all the hitting helped AIC "open up" Mercyhurst's defense to the point where AIC got another "point-blank" goal later in the opening period, including one during a Mercyhurst penalty slightly more than halfway through the period; Mercyhurst also had a goal denied due to the controversial "intent to whistle" rule, which happened after AIC had already opened up its 2-0 advantage...

The middle period saw no goals, and also saw Mercyhurst's defense "stiffen", forcing AIC to the outside, along with getting a few shots of its own on AIC's defense, most of which got held on to by the goaltender, along with drawing a few penalties of its own then, which largely contributed to the smaller disparity in shot totals then...

Lastly, the final period mostly served as a continuation of the preceding one, as Mercyhurst finally got on the scoreboard slightly more than halfway through the period, only to not have too many more shots the rest of the way, except for the last two minutes of the game, when Mercyhurst pushed AIC almost to the "breaking point" with an extra attacker on for the goaltender, although AIC "sealed the deal" with an empty-net goal with only about a pair of seconds remaining, taking what was essentially a 2-1 win, given the timing of that goal, out of what was probably the least-attended college hockey game anywhere in many years!

If you'll allow me to comment on the attendance now, yes, it was an afternoon game, but so was the start of the 2016 NJSIAA state high school ice hockey championship day at the Prudential Center, which was on a Monday afternoon, and, as such, in the middle of the school day for every school not on spring break that week (which I'm sure some of those schools weren't), so, if the NJSIAA and Prudential Center could get quite a few just students, much less other "regular" fans of the competing schools, or hockey in general, then, surely, AIC and the MassMutual Center, and even the Atlantic Hockey conference in general, which stretches out to Colorado Springs, home of the U.S. Air Force Academy, could, especially in this "social media age", which allows anybody to access anythinganytimeanyway, and anywhere, promote each game just about equally, making everybody who will be in, say, Colorado Springs, aware of games on any given day!

"I don't know what the paid attendance is today, but whatever it is, it is the smallest crowd in the history of Yankee Stadium, and this crowd is the story, not the game." - (Red Barber, New York Yankees' play-by-play announcer for channel 11 in N.Y.C., 9/22/66 - the Yanks lost to the Chicago White Sox that afternoon, 4-1; Barber would get fired a week later by CBS VP of diversification/Yankees' CEO/President, Edmund Michael Burke, whose first game in charge of the team was that one, largely due to that statement)




In other news now, the entire state of California practically looks like "**** on earth" right now, with wildfires raging north, south, and central, potentially threatening both L.A.-based NFL teams' games, since the Chargers were in the "soccer stadium" otherwise known as the StubHub Center, while the Rams were in the old L.A. Coliseum Sunday afternoon, and, surely, the Arizona Cardinals/Denver Broncos, being the closest "other" teams to L.A., would have objected to games (potentially) being moved closer to their respective stadiums!

In (more) retail news, Toys' "R" Us has apparently been victimized by the same things that Kmart/Sears have both been hit by - the rise of "e-commerce" sites like Amazon and eBay, yet left itself in a much better position to actually restructure its debts (with the exception of the company's Times Square "megastore", which I was actually inside of during the very last week of 2015/that store's existence, which, surprisingly, didn't have any of the usual "banners"/"signs" associated with such sales, but, unfortunately, didn't have too many "deals", either), instead of going through this painfully slow "winding-down" process, like Kmart and Sears this decade!


If you'll allow me to recap this past Thanksgiving/Black Friday weekend now, again, it was mostly a "boring/low-key" Thanksgiving Day itself here, and taking the day after as a bit of a "lazy day", instead of trying to "brave the crowds" out hunting for so-called "deals", when, in reality, as sad as it might be, physical retail is fast getting replaced by online retail, not exactly boding well for things like this from Apple, which I'm sure you already saw (or, I should say, got "force-fed" across every NFL game that weekend, along with a few other telecasts, like the NHL's Friday afternoon national telecast then, although the company seems to have "regained its senses" since then, and cut the thing down to 30/45 seconds), and saw me complaining about late that week, since:

(A) haven't we, as a society, always complained about being "bamboozled", yet letting things like that commercial, which you'd think would promoting either jewelry, and all the "romance" that has been associated with that historically, or something in the "performing arts", definitely not some little technological devices (Apple "AirPods" wireless earbuds, specifically) slip by most viewers;

(B) with all the "headlines" about celebrities/politicians being caught "behaving inappropriately", to say the very least there, you'd think a company as "image-conscious" as Apple wouldn't put forth something that might "trigger" (I honestly couldn't think of any other words there...) some people into seeing such "intimacy" as being "off-limits" for them, personally, given past events;

(C) the just plain "surrealism" on display there - I dare not just you, but anybody, to tell me, after seeing it, that that commercial was actually filmed outdoors, given all the "fancy" sound/visual/etc. effects on display there, along with its very "melancholic" tune;

(D) Apple's calling that its "holiday" ad for this year (2017), when, again, see point (A) - at least the company's "holiday" ads in previous years actually mentioned/referenced the "holiday season", instead of trying to push some totally B.S. "narrative/storyline", and, worst of all, making it a minute long, and then just cramming it into the middle of (mostly) live telecasts those few days/the long weekend!

Well, this appears to be it for me for now, since college sports usually take the Christmas/New Year's Eve/Day part of the year off (except for the New Year's Day college football "bowl" games, including the "playoff" games this New Year's Day), so, now, I'll just tell you to finish this year off on a "high" note, along with passing along some holiday season greetings, at least on a "just-in-case" basis, and tell you to "stay tuned" for my next report, which will come no later than the 1/6-1/7/18 weekend, when Army (or the U.S. Military Academy, to use its "official" name here) will face off against Sacred Heart inside the "new" (as in, "renovated") Nassau Coliseum out on Long Island! (other potential games within that timeframe: Maine @ RPI twice right before New Year's Eve (12/29-30, both @ 4 P.M.); St. Cloud State @ Princeton twice those same evenings (both 7 P.M. starts); UConn @ Boston College the afternoon of 12/30)