1/29/20

inaugural "Connecticut Ice" (day 1 of 2) recap

This past weekend, I returned to Bridgeport, CT, via Manhattan, on what started as an uglywet Saturday, to take in the start of something that many people around here hope ends up becoming a "staple" of college hockey - the "Connecticut Ice" tournament, featuring many "youth" games, all leading up to, at least this year, Quinnipiac v. UConn, and Sacred Heart v. Yale; the biggest problem, though, was a lack of "neutral sites" for the tournament - Quinnipiac, Sacred Heart, and UConn all have venues that arecertainlybig enough to host something on that level, but the Danbury Ice Arena, mostly a minor-league venue, is too small, and the Mohegan Sun Arena in the eastern part of the state has never hosted hockey, and I don't think was even built to accommodate the sport, so that left the Webster Bank Arena in the "Harbor Yard" section of Bridgeport, in which all four teams have at least built up a bit of "history" in terms of having played there previouslyeither as the "road" team against Fairfield (Fairfield, naturally/Shelton, CT) or Sacred Heart, when pretty much all teams there except Yale were at a more "minor" level within college hockey, orespecially for Yale, whenever they've reached a "regional" round hosted there...

The first game, again, featured Quinnipiac and UConn, and started out fairly evenly, and in a "physical" fashion that would remain the case throughout the game, with UConn opening the scoring courtesy of a rebound almost exactly five minutes into the game; it only took 18 seconds and the next face-off (excluding the ones immediately following goals, obviously) for Quinnipiac to answer, though, and Quinnipiac would take its first lead of the afternoon/evening a few minutes after that, when it managed to get a bit of a "breakaway" chance; the game would once again become tied late in the frame, however, as Quinnipiac's majority in the "puck possession" department suddenly betrayed itspecifically when the QU keeper misplayed a puck that he thought would be just far enough away to reach one of his defenders, only to instead have it reach somebody in "navy blue" (for UConn), to (eventuallyend the period with a 2-2 scoreline!

The middle 20 minutes saw Quinnipiac pull back to about "even" in terms of shots on goal initially, and get rewarded with the lead slightly under halfway through, by which point in time the game had suddenly started turning into one "scrum" after anotherone of the first of which would produce the next leading goal for Quinnipiac, which would remain the only goal through the rest of the period, albeit not before a rather ugly bit of high-sticking by somebody in yellow, which, after a rather lengthy video review, was determined to not have "drawn blood" and, thus, remain "minor", as hockey media/officials seemingly always refer to in such situations...

The final period saw no scoring, but made up for it in terms of "physicality" and "scrums" both ways, albeit with UConn suddenly "surging" by then in hopes of finding another "equalizer"; unfortunately for UConn, not even thator the "extra-man" situation late would end up working, as Quinnipiac took its mid-second period goal the rest of the way, and ended up winning, 3-2, sending the UConn "student section" gathered in the bottom half or so of section 114 back home disappointed, while pleasing the skating Quinnipiac cheerleaders (albeit pregame only, at least this time around), and advancing to face the winner of the second game this past Saturday evening!








The hour or so between QU-UConn and SHU-Yale seemingly took forever, perhaps 'cause I spent it wandering the only concourse of a building that still feels "stuck" back around the time it opened (2001), although I'm afraid such a "cramped" arrangement was the best outcome a place as "maligned", to say the very least, as Bridgeport could produce with such a large venue...

The start of the second game of the day went entirely in Sacred Heart's favor, with not dozens, but, rather, hundreds, for once, of red-clad fans celebrating multiple goals by their team early on - the first came roughly three minutes in, after a very early Yale penalty, the second followed a little under a couple minutes later, as SHU took advantage of a shot that went noticeably wide of goal by somebody on Yale, to be able to take the puck back the other wayfollowed by a turnover at Yale's blue line, to double the lead; the scoring would only continue laterspecifically shortly before the halfway point of the period, when SHU would convert on a breakaway opportunity while stilljust barelyshorthanded, and finally end the "goalfest" that was the opening period on a brilliant little bit of "point-blank" passing from behind the net, to mercifully end another downright "living nightmare" of a period for Yale, after Harvard's "drubbing" of Yale at MSG earlier this month, as Sacred Heart would end the period up 4-0, "chase" Yale's starting keeper long before he even could get "punch-drunk" the way he did near the end of said MSG contest, and finally allow even its own band to "settle down" after all those goal celebrations then!

It would be a play somewhat similar to the one that ended the scoring for Sacred Heart back near the end of the first period to finally give the "navy blue" men from Yale just about the only bit of "hope" they would have the entire night early in the second period, as Yale capitalized on a "man advantage", but, after that, the momentum returned to Sacred Heart, which, despite having had a goal disallowed due to the puck having been kicked into the net, still regained its four-goal advantage late in the period, finding just enough room between many skates and into the net near the end of a major penalty against Yale; the period would end at that margin on the scoreboard, as Sacred Heart would lead 5-1 after 40!

Goals would come for both teams in the last of six total periods of hockey in Bridgeport, CT, this past Saturday, with Sacred Heart notching its last goal of the night on the heels of a play similar to the 4-0 goal, albeit entirely in front of the net this time, to make it 6-1, and Yale would get a "fluky" goal very late in the game to end it by a final scoreline of 6-2 for Sacred Heart!








Sacred Heart is, apparentlyfinally, building its own arena on-campus by fall '22, in an announcement made just prior to the gametruly making the Webster Bank Arena the "neutral site" it wasn't quite this time around, considering Sacred Heart has easily become the "home" team there, with UConn having played a few games there, and Yale having put together a few "regionals" while Quinnipiac has largely yet to play "home" games there; as mentioned, the Sacred Heart band made the trip over from Fairfield, CT, to Bridgeport, and Sacred Heart had its usual public address announcer, on top of, obviously, playing in its usual home rink, at least for now, so that part seemed a little unfair to both Yale (Saturday nightand Quinnipiac (Sunday night)...)


Personally, I enjoyed this inaugural "doubleheader" on its own, but I'd still suggest some changesmostly having to do with the timing - namely, that the "semifinal" and "championship/consolation" rounds take place on back-to-back days, and that each "doubleheader" takes place back-to-backleading to "tedious" waits for those attending each game in each round - the Beanpot in Boston, on the other hand, takes place on back-to-back Mondays, making things much easier on all involved with said games; Bridgeport is set to once again host a "regional" tournament round in March of next year, so, surelythis weekend's games, along with next year's tournament, will be more than enough "practice" in terms of organizing "neutral sites"!


*multiple* recent college hockey recaps; *more* Kmart/Sears rumors; *still more* retail news; "decade in review"; etc.

(11/1)

The first weekend of this month was the season-opening weekend for the Ivy League schools on the ice for 2019-20, and, at least here, that meant another return trip to New Haven, CT, this time to watch Brown University face off against Yale - heading that way to begin with was rather "jarring" initially (more on that laterthis time around, but, as (almostalways, the game itself was rather entertaining, with Yale starting the game off with more possession, except being unable to even "buy" a goal until a little over halfway through it, smacking home a rebound from close range to open the game and season scoring for Yale; that lead would soon get doubled after the puck got taken behind the net initially before getting put home, but Brown would soon answer after finally keeping some more extended possession of its own early in the game, cutting the lead to 2-1, and the rest of the period would play out in that "even" fashion, with a couple of Yale penalties thrown in there in addition, yet without more scoring!

The second period played out much the same way as the end of the first period did, but, eventually, both teams would get into penalty trouble, with Yale getting called for a team penalty for "stalling" a bit too much on one of the face-offs just seconds after it had gotten a "man advantage", immediately erasinthat situation, but "opening up" the ice surface that much more than usual, and Yale ended up capitalizing on that additional room on the ice to again double its lead, by then, to 3-1; that was how the period would end!

The third period ended up very much in favor of Brown, though, despite just a single penalty being called, as Brown would indeed take advantage of said penalty call and "man advantage" situation to again cut the lead to justsingle goal (3-2); unlike Quinnipiac @ Yale in early February 2018, in which Quinnipiac just plain dominatedthis "final frame" was much less eventful, as Yale only needed a couple of "empty-net" clearings this time around to hang on for the 3-2 season-opening win!


Brown highlights/recap;


The crowd was surprisingly sparse for this being a "season-opening" game, though, even in spite of it featuring some of the "lesser" competitors in college hockey, and I'm not sure where the heck the Yale band was, 'cause it sure as heck wasn'at the aforementioned game; also, I'm not sure what ended up happening inside Yale's home rink this past summer, but whatever happened there then, the sound system seemingly ended up bearing the "brunt" of it all, as that sounded sort of "muffled" practically the entire night, even in spite of the operator(s) there being in a bit more of a "taunting" mood than (seemingly) usual with some of the in-house music choices, and the PA announcer mistakenly called the 3-1 goal "shorthanded", with the Yale hockey Twitter feed following suit by making the exact same mistake after the game - I guess some of those people got a bit too "bloated" on candy that weekend, and it ended up affecting their "situational awareness" and other such "cognitive traits"...


Speaking of "candy", things seemed rather weird this year, at least around here, since the thermometers showed incredibly humid 70+ degree temperatures on Thursday, albeit in wet conditions, which ended up remaining that way into early Friday before drying out and absolutely plummeting through the 60s and 50s, and only continuing to do so while I was watching Brown and Yale square off; while I noticed very few "trick-or-treaters" and people just generally wandering around in costumes this year compared to most previous ones, I did end up making it here, though, with only about 15 minutes to spare (shortly before 10 P.M.), and, in the process, ended up getting this huge quart-sized bottle of chocolate milk, which, I must say, in spite of the actual bottles there being mucbigger than pretty much all others, I'd still put Wawa's pint-sized bottles ahead of thoseflavor-wise; while there, I also noticed that some people apparently still can never put enough ice cream in their bodies, even on very cold and windy nights like that one, or during winters generally, although I'd still say that people drinking coffee during the warm months is much more common than that...

In other news, the media world recently completed its first full month without the name "Tribune Media" existing, since the forever operator of N.Y.C.'s channel 11 ended up completing its merger with the Nexstar Media Group back in late September, along with selling off other stations to the E.W. Scripps Company and Tegna, Inc.; also:







Also, earlier this fallanother set of rumors surrounding the "slow, yet steady" demise of Kmart/Sears has emerged, this time pertaining mainly to this post from TheLayoff.com, a message board mostly populated by retail employees who've experienced the situation referred to in the website's name; a summary of that post here, first, though:

- the company apparently wants to make it at least through fiscal quarter #3;

- all remaining Kmart locations have suddenly been placed on "death watch";

- the remaining Sears stores, on the other hand, shouldn't expect much more merchandise going forward, except for maybe holiday merchandise;

- the Kenmore appliance brand is apparently still "up for grabs";

- DieHard might get its own "auto centers", while Citigroup might end up getting the Kmart/Sears Shop Your Way "points program" as a result of the company's demise;

- JCPenney might be much closer to its demise than anybody previously thought!


Personally, I'm hoping those rumors are not true, if only 'cause I've been meaning to check out the 1930s "Art Deco" Sears location in downtown Hackensack, N.J., sometime before then, and, obviously, the company entering full-on "liquidation" mode would end such plans, and these comments in particular basically seem to form a "microcosm" of the company in recent years:

1: "One can never underestimate Eddie's capacity for failure. A $55 billion dollar company? Eddie can turn it into a bankrupt company. Losing $1B a year? Eddie can turn it into a $12B loss. 5,500 stores? Eddie can turn it into 200 stores. A $9B fortune? He can turn it into a $1B fortune. He can spin off all of Sears' properties, and instead of investing it properly in the business and customers, he can use it to line his own pockets, and failed investments worth less than nothing, bankrupting shareholders, his partners, and his investors too. Then he'll beg banks and borrow money, and borrow more from the equities markets, and he'll bankrupt them too. Holiday season? Eddie can lose $2B over a holiday season. Sure, Sears might last another two years or so. Eddie might find other ways to siphon other people's wealth and turn it into trash. Maybe he can destroy some other retirees' insurance benefits, their pensions, their livelihoods, as well as all the people who put their savings and funds into Sears in good faith while he s—ed it off into Seritage, ESL and his own pockets, because the bankruptcy code lets you do that as long as it takes you longer than two years. Never underestimate Eddie's capacity for fail. There's a reason that he's often acclaimed as the worst CEO in the history of CEOs, by other American CEOs. Not only is he screwing everyone at every opportunity partially by maliciousness, mostly by incompetence, he's also screwing himself every step of the way because he hasn't the foggiest idea what he's doing. No doubt he could continue to "Transform" Sears for the next 20 years, and his apologists, probably himself, will probably be posting on here saying, SEE?!!??!! SEARS IS STILL AROUND!!!!"

2: "It's a good thing we are in the last couple of months here. The registers are so old that they are dying of old age as we speak. Who keeps equipment for 40 years? The spikes that hold the bags at the register are eye level with a 3 year old, and I often fear the worst while trying to ring up a busy mom. Many prices are not as posted, and the minimum wage employees like to give shoppers a lot of advice on how to increase savings, whether it's compatible with what we do here or not. Thanks, just venting."

...even so, Kmart and Sears are so financially "insolvent" that, even if they do end up making through (what's left of) this year, chances are they might not make it through next year:


...which explains that Eddie Lampert, the pathetic excuse of a "leader" at said retail chains for seemingly forever now, didn't even bother voting on the company's latest creditor payment/debt restructuring plan; now, just about all creditors involved seem to have predicted that the company will end up filing C7 bankruptcy "sooner rather than later", and, thus, end the runs of Kmart and Sears after over a century each; in other news surrounding those chains now, a Sears credit card holder (out in Ohio) for an even longer time than that of "Fast Eddie" just plain wrecking the company is legitimately worried about the company's demise ruining his credit score, considering how long he's had that card now:


...it also seems like department stores will struggle in general over the next few months:


...yet, in spite of that:


As for retail in general now, yes, it sure is sad time for that industry, with just about every "household name" in some bit of trouble, although I'd hold off on proclaiming "the death of Macy's", specifically, since that chain announced not one, but two sets of renovations - "Growth50" last year, followed by, you guessed it, "Growth150" this year, with another 100 locations set to receive, in some case, their first-ever renovations, at least as Macy's locations; the irony, though, with this whole "retail apocalypse" was that many of them had opportunities to basically "pre-empt" the likes of Amazon/eBay/etc. in the '80s and '90s, yet none of them actually took advantage, leading to the present day, in which even the most optimistic predictions about the "future" seem to only consider Amazon, eBay, Target, and Walmart, with no other names referenced therein!

There's certainly something to be said about those places trying to be both "reachable" and "upscale", though, especially Macy's and Target, in my opinion - I mean, there's only so much that can be done by placing, for instance, Chanel fragrances, Levi's jeans/other pants, Polo Ralph Lauren apparel, Tissot watches, and, even, such as Macy's Willowbrook (N.J.), Starbucks kiosks, all right next to each other...

(11/15)

Once again this year, just like this time last year, I was down in Princeton to catch RPI visiting the campus in central Jersey, with Princeton using its campus ROTC almost as a "proxy" of sorts for local/regional veterans in honor of Armistice/Veterans Day generally pregame, along with the mothers of a couple of Princeton's "class of 1978"-graduated players dropping the puck "ceremonially" (more about that group of "past" Princeton hockey players a little later); after that, the game itself started with many turnovers both ways, before RPI seemingly "settled in" first, with the first goal for RPI coming roughly seven minutes in courtesy of a deflection just inside its own defensive zone being taken the rest of the way back the other way, and, while it ended up taking the rest of the period, RPI did end up doubling its lead just in time for the intermission after one of the various turnovers, that time behind the Princeton net, got "centered" right in front, and, naturally, ended up in the back of the net to give RPI a 2-0 lead through the first 20 minutes!

I mentioned the mothers of a couple of the Princeton "class of '78" appearing pregame; turns out that pretty much the entire rest of the "class of '78" squad, comprised entirely of freshmen mostly "discovered" back in 1973/74 in various other U.S. states and/or Canadian provinces, and, obviously, brought from wherever they happened to have played then to Newark Airport, and then down from there to the campus, although, presumably, not to any "convenience stores" of any sort, such as the Wawa there (which the Princeton girls' lacrosse team ended up taking up quite a bit of space in last night after what I could've only guessed was a practice for its upcoming season), which just barely existed then; that Princeton squad, however, only managed to reach a maximum win-loss-tie record of 9-14-1 in 1973-74, and 9-14-2 in 1977-78, so, unlike the 1998 and 2008 teams that Princeton honored last year that ended up winning the ECAC Hockey title, the mid-70s teams were "mediocre at best"...

The second period, however, saw the current Princeton team rebound from its slow start, taking quite a few more shots by then, and also staying out of penalty trouble, but RPI ended up doing just about the exact same thing, so, all told, the second period ended up being scoreless, albeit not without its "close calls", including a "ping" or two!

The final 20 minutes of the game saw Princeton finally get rewarded for slowly rebounding during the middle period, as things ended up getting increasingly physical by then, along with a few more RPI players getting sent to the "sin bin" then compared to the previous 20 minutes, and Princeton indeed would end up converting on one of those opportunities to cut the lead in half roughly halfway through the period, and tying the game not long after that, after which the game essentially ended up becoming a "blitzkrieg" of chances both ways, with, somehow, no additional scoring to show for it, although Princeton came within both inches, and seconds, of winning the game in regulation on a literal last-second breakaway chance, but (A) that chance ended up getting stopped by the RPI goaltender, and (B) it might have been just split-second too late for Princeton, anyway, considering the buzzer sounded just as the shot got taken!

Overtime mostly went in favor of RPI, albeit not nearly as "eventful" as the last regulation period, with just a few "potshots" getting taken, as both teams seemed content with skating to a tied final score by then, which would indeed end up happening, with the teams tied at 2!


the literally "lights out" highlights, as you'll notice after each of the Princeton goals, although they did something similar before the start of the third period;





(11/30)

This past weekend (Sat.), I was once again out on, at least personally, a slightly warmer-than-expected night at MSG for the bi-annual (every two years) Boston U. v. Cornell game that, specifically at MSG, "only" dates back to 2007, but, overall, goes back almost a century (1925), although BU entered this game having gotten routed, at home, by Sacred Heart right before Thanksgiving - meanwhile, whoever currently ranks college hockey teams apparently considered Minnesota State defeating Alaska-Anchorage twice recently better than Cornell defeating Quinnipiac and Princeton; hence, the rankings this past week kept Minnesota State (#1 overall ranking) above Cornell (#2 overall ranking)...

The game honestly started very slowly this time around, with no "official" shots on goal recorded either way for roughly the first five minutes, although the almost century-long rivals certainly didn't leave their "physicality" behind in Boston and Ithaca, NY, respectively - there was quite a bit of that up until BU got the first "official" shot on goal of the game, again, approximately five minutes in; while the period ended in a scoreless fashion, with just a trio of penalties then, BU ended up doubling Cornell's shot total, and generally staying "closer" to scoring...

The start, at least, of the middle 20 minutes of the action, though, definitely belonged to Cornell, and it would end up being that more "sustained" possession by then that would end up helping Cornell open the scoring, as they essentially ended up playing a little game of "keep-away" from the BU defenders by dumping the puck around the boards a couple of times, hoping to catch somebody in white just off-guard enough to leave the front of the net open, and, indeed, that was exactly what happened, leading to a wide-open rebound that got put home for the first goal of the night; as it turned out, Cornell would double its lead just seconds later, as the puck once again ended up getting poked out of one of the corners and "centered" way too late for anybody on BU to catch up, making it 2-0 by then, and forcing the BU coaches to "talk things over"; whatever was said then might have worked initially for BU, as they briefly regained the "shots-on-goal" advantage, but that doesn't account for too much more than "pride" when you've just surrendered two goals in not even a half-minute; penalty-killing was just about the only thing that BU had going "right" for it at that point, and said unit would "stop the bleeding" just enough a little later on to keep Cornell's lead at a pair of goals heading into the last period!

The third period was just about "even" overall, in contrast with BU grabbing the momentum to start the game, and Cornell doing so later in order to score that aforementioned pair of goals, although it seemingly returned to the almost painfully-slow pace that the first few minutes had; certainly not due to a lack of "rough-and-tumble" play by then, though, as one stoppage resulted in "matching" minor penalties, and another stoppage resulted in a "pile-up" behind what was, once again, by then, the Cornell crease/net; otherwise, Cornell would end up evening up the "shots-on-goal" count by the end of the game, along with keeping its 2-0 lead all the way to "final score" territory, and seeing people "head for the exits" quite early, in all honesty, while others who remained expressed what had very much become boredom by then in various ways; certainly, though, in a sense, BU fans probably got a sense of "deja vu" then, at least so far this season, seeing their team struggle greatly offensively, while Cornell fans likely still had the 4-1 losing outing that even the team's coaches called "lifeless" this time last year at MSG against Harvard a bit too "fresh" in their minds, so maybe they were just hoping for even a relatively "greasy" win this year for the team itself to also be able to finally put that game in the "rear-view mirror"!






...alsothis...)

...the end result of the game could have been much worse than the rather "dull" contest that graced MSG with its presence this past weekend, though, considering some of the results on the collegiate ice elsewhere in the country this month; it could've been either:



(12/6)

Yesterday (Fri.) afternoon, I once again returned to Princeton, this time to catch another team nicknamed the "Tigers", Colorado College (located right near the U.S. Air Force Academy and its hockey program, in fact, in Colorado Springs), visiting - the start time of the game alone was honestly just plain weird, given that it was still "light" outside; the rink staff "showed off" the newly-upgraded lighting a little bit more right before the game, actually using a little bit of "color-changing" to light the ice surface in, first, the "red/white/red" of the Canadian flag, obviously followed by the "red/white/blue" of this country's flag, and, while I'm on the subject, yes, Princeton always does that, since just about as many of the players on the visiting squads happen to be Canadian, let alone the "home team", so that, to me, seems like a nice little "nod" to the many contributions Canada has made, particularly in that sport up until now!

The actual game, though, started with Princeton getting credited for all the shots on goal during the opening minutes, despite C.C. "pinning" the Princeton defense deep a few times early on, along with more than a few penalties each way then; Princeton would indeed get "rewarded" for its more persistent pressure early in the game roughly halfway through the opening 20 minutes courtesy of a mini-"breakaway" that just caught the C.C. defense "napping", and allowed for the slightest of crossing passes for an easy tip-in goal to open the scoring on the evening; after that, though, C.C. slowly recovered in the "shot department", and, naturally, ended up tying the game on what ended up being the first of multiple rebounds surrendered by Princeton's defense, then had another similar chance go its way only a couple of minutes later to suddenly lead on the scoreboard; the "shot totals" would remain just about even the rest of the way, and, as such, C.C. kept said 2-1 lead after the opening period!

After the intermission in which there was actually a little bit of a "disco party", of sorts, for a few seconds right near the end of said intermission, again, courtesy of the brand-new lights inside Princeton's rink, a few more penalties got called, followed by C.C. doubling its lead on, you guessed it, yet another rebound opportunity that slipped just far enough away from any of the guys wearing white, with the fourth goal for C.C. arguably being the "softest" of all of them, with a very long-range initial shot also getting poked loose in front before getting put in the net, although that goal ended up getting reviewed by the officials (for the possibility of it having been offside a few seconds prior to the goal) for so long that there was actually some French-language rock music played inside the rink briefly; the shots were still largely "even" by then, albeit increasingly in favor of Princeton, except things kept going the other way on the scoreboard, as C.C. padded its lead once again with barely a minute remaining in the period, by which point in time Princeton's defense didn't even bother giving up a rebound chance in front, making it a 5-2 C.C. lead after the middle 40 minutes!

The last period of the game saw C.C. extend its lead even further than previouslydespite Princeton slowly widening the "shot" difference, as C.C. struck twice, doing so, by then, against Princeton's backup keeper and what looked like an even more "absentee" defense; despite a ten-minute team penalty against C.C. by then, the last goal actually ended up being "shorthanded" in nature for C.C., finally ending the game soon thereafter by a 7-2 margin (although Princeton's women'hockey team also ended up getting trounced by Cornell in the game immediately following Colorado College's "romp" over the Princeton men...; I wasn'at that game, though, since I wanted to take advantage of C.C. @ Princeton taking place in the afternoon/evening to wander around downtown Princeton for a couple of hours or so)!











(12/26)

Also, this Christmas brought about some "last-minute" updates to the news within the retail industry, including even more news from Kmart/Sears, and a broader "look back" at trends in recent years:


(First off this time, easily the biggest bit of retail news this Christmas was Kmart/Sears (well, specifically Sears) selling off the DieHard auto parts brand it had owned for decades to Advance Auto Parts, leaving only Kenmore now as an "exclusive" brand within the company; it was said that CEO/chairman Eddie Lampert had already tried to sell off all three of the company's "most famous" brands (Craftsman tools; DieHard auto parts; Kenmore appliances) under the "old" Kmart/Sears, but, obviously, now, said "leader" only managed to sell off one brand under both the "new" (DieHard, to Advance Auto Parts) and "old" (Craftsman, to Stanley/Black & Decker tools) Kmart/Sears operations this year, while the Kenmore brand might very well, at this point, end up "going down with the ship", so to speak, once the day finally arrives on which all remaining Kmart/Sears locations start closing...)



(two "post-mortem" articles on Blockbuster Video, now reduced to just single location worldwide, from thousands back in the 1990s)


(basically, "Macy*s, Nordstrom, Target, or 'other'?")


(how online and physical retailers alike have vastly sped up their shipping times for orders, with even the "pharmacy duopoly" of CVS and Walgreens getting in on that act...)


(apparel looks to have particularly been hurt by retail's "slow-motion collapse" in recent years...)


(I know I (half-jokingly) called CVS and Walgreens the "pharmacy duopoly" earlier, but it seems that what few Rite Aid locations remain now have given the company a financial "lifeline" recently!)



(Lastly this time, at least on the retail front, Macy*s and Wawa both had their card processing systems breached in recent months; suffice it to say, now, hopefully you didn'use any cards at any of those locations recently!)

(1/6/2020)

This past weekend, I visited MSG, and N.Y.C. generally, for the first time in a decade (the 2020s) other than "the 2010s", on a warm night (which made things a little awkward heading into the arena, admittedly, although I did hang around just a bit longer than usual after the game, mostly within Times Square and surrounding neighborhoods; there's a Modell's Sporting Goods location there that's somehow still open in "liquidation" mode, which has been the case for months now...) duringwhat's been a warm start to the decade overall (albeit not quite as warm as 2015/'16unfortunately...) - Harvard and Yale happened to be the participating teams on this occasion, after having previously faced off at MSG in 2014 (Yale 5, Harvard 1) and '15 (Yale 4, Harvard 1)prior to those couple of years, the teams hadn't met there since the 1970 edition of the old "ECAC Holiday Hockey Festival" held between 1961 and 1977; their entire history in the "Big Apple", however, longer than any of the many famous movies/plays/etc. set there later in the 20th century, dates all the way back to the beginning of the aforementioned 20th century, when the teams met at the old St. Nicholas Arena, an old boxing/hockey/wrestling venue, stretching between W 66/67th Streets between Columbus Avenue and Central Park West in Manhattan, currently home to ABC television (Channel 7 WABC; ABC News; etc.)!

Pre-game, there was a little bit of confusion suddenly created by MSG staff, as the 200-level seats of the Garden had suddenly gotten closed due to a claimed "lack of sales" necessary to even open said seating level; personally, I ended up going from section 211 (a "center-ice" section), to section 117 (another "center-ice" section), through two MSG "ushers", finally, to section 120 (definitely not a "center-ice" section)!

The game started in Harvard's favor, albeit with Yale not getting enough "credit" in terms of "shots on goal", at least in my opinion, early, along with a devastating "hip check" at one point - it would be one of the first couple of penalties of the game, though, that would allow Harvard to open the scoring, with a "man advantage" caused by a little bit of "headhunting" by one of Yale's defenders being converted just seconds into said "advantage" situation for Harvard; that goal would provide the only scoring in the period, though, as Yale kept things close early...

The first intermission of the game actually featured a special "mini-game" as part of a series of them in support of "environmental awareness", for lack of a better term, featuring many hockey hall-of-famers and other "celebrities"; the teams split up into "blue" and "red" teams over the course of 10 minutes, with the "blue" team winning said "mini-game", 2-1, before the "regular" first intermission took place!

Harvard notched its second goal early in the middle frame, withstanding potential tripping situation right before then - after review, the Yale defender behind the net right before said goal was determined to have fallen on his ownkeeping that goal on the scoreboard as originally called, while Yale still tried to keep things "tight" defensively, which, as you'll come to find out, didn't last, but Harvard did add another goal roughly halfway through the period to make it 3-0, by which point things were suddenly even more "wide open" for the crew in "crimson" red/white, and Yale started getting "testy" defensively, at least; as Yale still didn't quite "break" then, however, that would be the margin by which the period would end!

The final 20 minutes only saw even more scoring on Harvard's part, though, especially after the game became 4-0, as the fifth goal came immediately after a brutally-timed turnover by one of Yale's defenders, nobody in "navy blue" stopped a "zipped" cross-ice pass for 6-0, and Yale's goalkeeper just plain tripping over his skates led to the 7-0 goal - the "festivities" in the long-standing collegiate rivalry still refused to end by then, though, as a stoppage with barely a minute and a half remaining in a game that had long since been decided in favor of Harvard saw Yale's, by thenclearly frustrated, goalkeeper "froze" the puck, then started throwing punches at the Harvard forward who looked like he had just "slid" into him; after a few penalties got assessed in the aftermath of said "fracas", Harvard officially took its convincing 7-0 trouncing of Yale back to suburban Boston!













On a few more personal notes now:

(A) I found my middle school yearbook a few months ago;

(B) our previous (LG) washing machine started leaking a few weeks ago, after only a couple of years, forcing us to replace it last weekend, and getting a new one (Samsung) installed this one;

(C) I recently got these, which are a little more "high-top"-esque than most sneakers, albeit as a "backup", of sorts, to these things I purchased a year ago;

Also, our next-door neighbors recently adopted this "ginger" orange cat, and he's already tried to sneak into our place - once, over Christmas, when I caught him on our back porch - since then, he's appeared a few times in front of our place, and then again on the porchmostly leading to our dog chasing him away, which I'm afraid might have caused her to start limping, possibly having pulled something in her back legs in particular; he's also had a few encounters with a stray black-and-white cat in our neighborhood recently; most of which have consisted of the black-and-white cat "jumping" him before he's sprinted back to the side door of our neighbors' place...

Also, I'm planning on knocking out as much "uncharted territory" here by visiting as many of the malls in this state in the "foreseeable future" (albeit usually in warmer weather), including possibly visiting both the Menlo Park and Woodbridge Center malls on the same day, again, most likely during a "warm" time of year... While I'm on the subject of retail, I might as well also mention this!

Lastly this time, there's been a bit of a "kerfluffle" in Higashi-Osaka/Minami-Kamikosaka, Japan, between 7&I Holdings, the parent of Japanese 7-Eleven, and the franchise owner of just one 7-Eleven location there got into a bit of a dispute recently, first over the store's customer complaints recently, then over the owner's decision to close the location that usually operates "24/7/365" on New Year's Day; as such, the franchise owner basically went "rogue" in the new year, stripping the cash register that was previously in the store (and installing a "portable" one to replace it), shutting down the ATM, (seemingly) stopping all fresh food deliveries, and discounting all items up to 30% off (so far); judging by the owner's very "brash" and sudden reaction to the news, I'd say I'd personally be more inclined to strip him of his authority there, but, on the other hand, I noticed that one of his main complaints was about hours, which, having been there (to Japan generally, not that specific store), I definitely remember hearing and/or seeing such complaints from many people, so hopefully those employees that 7&I franchisee might have already chased away from his location find new positions A.S.A.P., hopefully with shorter hours, and more off days, and the couple of remaining ones seen in the above articles escape that situation soon!

UPCOMING: the "Connecticut Ice" tournament at the Webster Bank Arena in Bridgeport, Connecticut, Sat. 25 (Quinnipiac v. UConn @ 4 P.M.; Sacred Heart, technically the "host" of said "mini-tournament", v. Yale immediately following), and Sun. 26 (featuring the "consolation game" from Saturday's doubleheader involving the two losing teams in those games, followed by the "championship game" featuring the teams that end up happening to win each of Saturday's games, over said weekend), so, now, as promised recentlyafter I recapped BU v. Cornell @ MSG, in the spirit of "looking back", are my thoughts on events within this past decade generally:

Technology, such as this, but especially "social media", only increased its presence in society, certainly bringing people together, but, at the same time, allowing what can politely be described as "misinformation" to be spread like wildfire, stoking much more chaosfear, and hatred, among other ugly sentiments, along with widening the gap between the "perception" and "reality" of just about everything in modern society, which, all things consideredactually sort of seems to have improved ever so slightly in the 2010s, at least in my opinion, although things seem to be getting more "volatile" again nowespecially with the rise of new "political regimes" in way too many countries, including some, eerily enough, like parts of Europe and Latin America, that previously toppled similar types of oppressive/tyrannical governmental "regimes" historically; as I've told you many a time now, also, "daily life" has largely shifted online, especially retail, as evidenced by the rise of Amazon/eBay/etc., and the massive collapse(s) of Kmart/Sears, and, to a lesser extent, JCPenney, along with others (Macy's; Target; etc.) seemingly starting to "slip" recently, revenue-wise; so on/so forth...

On a personal note now, well, I "made it" through both my high school and (under-graduate) college years this decade, but slowly witnessed the "social group" I had graduated high school drift apartlittle by little, as everybody went off to different places after that, and, personally, I never seemed to "fit in" with any particular "groups" whatsoever in college, whereas I recall (more-or-less) being "friends" with just about every "type" of student before then (H.S.); as such, my health seems to have taken a slight turn for the worse, overall, although I'd say the opposite for this region generally - "development", in general, in the N.Y.C. region has boomed within the past decade, arguably starting with Red Bull Arena in Harrison, N.J. and the billion-dollar renovations at Madison Square Garden between then and 2013; that "boom" around here within the past decade, though, has, thankfully, generally not "correlated" with more negative "quality-of-life" aspects, such as crime rates, and general "decay", with, at least in my opinion, places like Harrison (Red Bull Arena + new condos/restaurants) and Hoboken (proximity to N.Y.C. + continued building/new "nightlife"/etc.), experiencing the biggest improvements, along with a bit of an "honorable mention" to Maplewood/South Orange (not to be confused with the City of Orange, East Orange, and Irvingtonall of which, sadly, remain the equivalents in that part of the state as places like Passaic and Paterson around here, or Atlantic City/Camden/Trenton), and, as I personally ended up finding out within the past decade, Montclair (similar to Hoboken/Morristown with "new nightlife"); with even some places that basically got "left for dead" by most people years ago, like Jersey City/Perth Amboy/etc. experiencing quite noticeable "rebounds" in just about every aspect of life in those cities - even the "Big Apple" itself saw record levels of such "trends" within its boundaries in recent years, despite things like the City losing the 2012 Olympic Games to London, and, more recently, Amazon deciding to build its second corporate HQ complex near Washington, D.C.; personally, as I told you a few weekends ago, I'm planning on visiting more "uncharted territory" types of places near N.Y.C. (Maplewood/Millburn/Morristown/Ridgewood/South Orange/etc.), and, to a lesser extent, Philly (Cherry Hill/Collingswood/Haddonfield/Moorestown/etc.) within the "foreseeable future", along with, againlikely returning to downtown Princeton during a warmer time of the year at least once to explore those "downtown" streets more fully!